Ikea and me

image

Today I spent five hours attempting to assemble Ikea furniture while also drinking beer.

I decided to document it because, well, I knew it probably wouldn’t end well (at least for the furniture). It’s a departure from my normal blogs in that it’s mainly photos and maybe the “odd” video of me fighting a losing battle, so here goes…

imageIt’s surprising how much you can fit into a Fiat 500 and please note the six pack of beer because I had a sneaky suspicion that I might need it.

imageI had to carry this box, which weighed more than 30 kilograms, up a flight stairs to get to my new “writing room”. It was 30-plus degrees today with high humidity so that was really fun. I also am so awesome that I didn’t ask anyone to help me. What a superstar.
image

This was the moment I realised that the instruction booklet for my new writing desk ran to more than 20 pages and I didn’t own a flat head screwdriver. So I decided to have a beer.

image

Even though the instructions are in English they might as well have been in Swedish and I soon realised that I’d put the “sidey, rolley bits” for the desk drawers on backwards.

image

One of the top moments of the day was surely realising that I had put the top of the desk on backwards and would need to de-construct almost the whole fucken thing. So, here I am pondering whether my life has any meaning, and whether I am in fact a dumbass.

image

After “successfully” assembling my new writing table, from which a plethora of Pultizer and Oscar-winning stories will no doubt be created, I see that the drawers are a little off-kilter and I am a victim of premature celebration. So, after nearly three hours, because I was clearly winning, I decide I might as well assemble the book-shelf. Here’s what happened not long after…

I’d had about four beers by this stage so I decided to take an Ikea “Kallax”  reflection selfie.

image

I must admit that having beers makes the whole Ikea process much more enjoyable but you also get a little distracted. Such as this photo when I realised that my lady-bird was on a precarious lean. I knew the feeling.

image

While listening to some very good, and increasingly loud, tunes I had a moment when I thought I was the Ikea Queen. This is a piece of piss I thought while simultaneously dancing in my study. Then I realised that my joy was about to be curtailed by the dreaded Ikea hinges.

image

And then this. I mean, what the fuck is this supposed to mean?

image

So the “ghost hand” freaked me out so much I had to do this.
image

Then I spent an hour trying to decipher how to turn two of the empty spaces in my book shelf into cupboards and, well, seriously fucked it up. I have never been so confused in my life. So here is the denouement of my efforts. What a glorious victory!

Sure beats the blog I was going to write about my ex coming around to pick up his furniture.

 

 

The age of outrage

Angry-Cartoon-9-470x470

Let’s get one thing straight: women don’t become journalists if they’re princesses. If you’re a chick who’s easily offended then there are hundreds of other jobs out there better suited to you than being a journo.

The past week or two, however, I’ve witnessed a concerning phenomenon. Seemingly, if you’re a female journo and someone “offends” you (on the telly usually), then the public will go on a outrage crusade on your behalf, regardless of whether you want them to or not.

I’ve been a journalist for some 15 years and during that time I’ve been propositioned, stalked, told many times that I don’t “look like a journalist” and that I had nice tits (well, I do) and generally been harangued by a huge variety of people, not all of them men.

The stalking scenario was serious and was dealt with appropriately, but the rest of the “offences” didn’t really bother me overly much. I often found them funny and usually tried to have a witty retort when something was a bit on the nose. I guess my point of view is that sometimes some people are just dicks and know not what they say because of that rather dangly impediment. It’s not a hanging offence. They’re just idiots – temporary or otherwise. Especially when one’s job involves dealing with relative strangers on the record and off. Humans are unpredictable creatures and sometimes, yep, we make mistakes.

Who knows why some people take offence and some don’t? It’s clearly got something to do with psychology and I don’t think my girlhood was any better or worse than any other woman my age. I grew up in the ‘70s and things were much different then. Many women worked as secretaries, very few went to university and I guess even fewer were journalists.

While today’s teenage “role models” writhe around singing in the nude on a wrecking ball while licking its chain, we had still mostly-clothed idols that “pushed the envelope” by singing about abortion and about being single. It really does seem bloody tame in comparison.

We had teachers who tried to feel the bra strap under your shirt when you were 12 (it was a waste of time with me back then) and others who screamed and yelled at you in a locked gym after school hours when you mucked around “too much” at basketball.

All of these things are now rightfully illegal but back in the day it was kind of normal. That’s because some people are creepy, dirty pervs who should never have been teachers and sometimes they’re just having a bad day and you had the bad fortune of getting in their way.

Thinking back on that time, which was and wasn’t as innocent as today, it’s interesting that these days we have the very worst of humanity available at our very fingertips. Via the internet, if you’re so inclined, you can access hardcore porn and vision of murders and beheadings. There appears to be nothing sacred any more. Yet, paradoxically, we also live in an age where minor indiscretions become major issues just because someone, at one moment in their lives, is deemed not to be perfect by a vocal minority, with a global platform they don’t deserve, and the “outrage crusade” swings (momentarily because it’s always that) into action. What a farce.

Making a public play for a female TV reporter on-air just made cricketer Chris Gayle look like a douche. The journo has admitted she wasn’t overly fussed and wanted to move on from it, but Australia at large decided to be outraged on her behalf. Who knows why? Perhaps to make themselves look like good people who clearly have never tried to chat someone up – at work or the pub – and made a complete knob of themselves in the process.

The politician who called a journo a mad witch in a private message and then mistakenly sent it to her isn’t the devil incarnate, he’s a Neanderthal technophobe who needs to learn how to use his mobile phone better. We’ve all sent messages to people in error, including me when I accidentally text my mum years ago with a sexy love ditty meant for my boyfriend at the time. Her reply was simply, “I don’t think this is for me, dear.”

In the “witch” instance, again the journalist didn’t over-react to receiving the text and in fact was very good-natured about the incident. Like I said, if you’re a female journalist you have to have thick skin – and not because you’re a woman. Because as a reporter your job is to ask people questions that they don’t want to answer to try to uncover the truth. So if you’re going to run away and hide at the first denial, well, you won’t make it very far in the media and might as well go and work as a barista. I don’t think either of the women in these latest episodes are wilting waifs who need society to jump to their defence. They both seem pretty damn capable to me.

Sexual harassment is never okay but neither is trying to turn relatively benign fuck-ups into something that they’re not. I truly believe that sometimes people are just knob-heads and unless you can hand on heart say you’ve never said something offensive (in public or private) or done something you regret, then please don’t get outraged on my behalf because of my gender.

I’m a big girl. I don’t need someone to take the moral or sexual high ground for me. When something offends me, it’s only me that can make that judgment because I am the sum of my experiences not anyone else. And if that does happen, which is very rare I must admit, you can bet the poor person on the receiving end will feel every ounce of my justified outrage because, get this, I am a woman and I can also stand up for myself.

The unbearable lightness of low-alcohol beer

cartoon_beer_sticker-r946888370eef4ec2abcba6782fcaf0bc_v9waf_8byvr_512

For the first time in quite a few years, I decided to have a few drinkies on New Year’s Eve. Unfortunately my choice of beverage was less than ideal and significantly diluted my dance moves on the first early morning of 2016.

I think it’s been about four years since I’ve had a drink on the last night of the year. For at least two years before I had my 18-month hiatus off the stuff (a blog topic coming soon), I’d had sober New Year’s Eves by choice. I guess when you get to a certain age, there aren’t that many decent parties you’re invited too and hanging out at nightclubs with all the youngsters is lame, and let’s face it, a little creepy, too.

So this year, with my party invite in hand, I decided to crack open a couple to see where the night ended up and to say good riddance to a pretty sucky 2015.

The problem with the holiday season, though, is that Christmas Day and New Year’s Eve are so bloody close together. Why can’t they be a few weeks, or better yet, a few months apart so you can get into match fitness for both?

I asked this question at a family barbecue last night and it was suggested that perhaps we could celebrate Christmas in January or February sometime instead? That idea lasted all of two seconds before everyone decided that our family being our family meant we’d probably just end up with one extra excuse for a party and be worse off than we were before.

This Christmas Day was a spectacular one with all the stuff everyone loves, including a highly memorable game of “what’s an alternative use for this crap shoe horn that one of us received in our festive bon-bon?” The winning idea, although debatable and somewhat hazy I must admit, was either Keith Richard’s cocaine scooper or an eyebrow shaper.

There were no family arguments, in fact it was a huge success until someone (who may or may not have been me) decided that it was time for some Scotch on the rocks. In hindsight, I realise now that was a mistake and that going to sleep in a hallway probably wasn’t one of my finest hours. I blame it on the 5km run I did that morning, mind you.

So it was this episode that convinced me to consume low-alcohol beer on New Year’s Eve instead. No more Scotch shenanigans. No more waking up on the air-bed wondering how I got there.

The New Year’s party started and the low-alcohol beers actually tasted pretty good but as the night wore on I became increasingly annoyed. You see, everyone else was getting into the festive spirit, and I was not. Those goddamn light beers were keeping me in a twilight zone of very mildly, not really much of a glow-on at all, state of mind. Which is their job, but I didn’t know it.

While all the other party-goers started talking and laughing louder, for me not much changed at all. I wouldn’t have minded being sober for my fifth New Year’s Eve in a row if I hadn’t paid so much for the beer and known that each one was also about 100 calories. My wallet and waist-line would’ve been much better off if I’d just stuck to water.

I was staring down a sober midnight when about an hour before, someone (who may or may not have been me) suggested that a few sneaky shots might get the party really humming. My suggestion, however, was a fait accompli as one of the guys had pre-planned for such a happening and brought along an assortment of “masculine” liquers, which would be fashioned into something sickly-sweet called a Jam Donut.  They then decided that Baileys, another testosterone-laden drink I might add, was also a very good idea.

It was at this point that my soberness became my best friend because after only a few I said no more, while the group of guys went on to knock them back one after another. I hear they paid for that big time the next day.

After midnight came and went, someone (who may or may not have been me) reminded the “stayers” about the infamous interpretative dance-off we’d had at the same location at one of the host’s 40th birthday parties a few years before.

As soon as I said it, though, I knew that I wasn’t drunk enough by half to take part but, yet again, I’d backed myself into an embarrassing corner that only a few split-leaps and pirouettes could extricate me from.

So it was that after a marvellous interpretative dance by R that was worthy of a standing ovation, I found myself in a “dance battle” with the said same person to, of all tunes, Welcome to the Jungle.

But I knew within mere moments that my sick dance moves just weren’t there. In fact, the contest was over before it’d even began. The unbearable lightness of that low-alcohol beer had, alas, left me with nowhere to turn except sheepishly back to my seat mid-song with my head bowed in eternal shame.

My self-appointed crown as the interpretative dance-off queen was well and truly lost. Although, I now admit, that my dignity remained intact, which was the whole point, so perhaps not such a bad result after all.